Will Self on The White Guard by Mikhail Bulgakov | Culture | The Guardian
The Master and Margarita () defines Bulgakov. It catches the mood of its time. It reflects the fears and doubts spawned by dictatorship. The other point is that Monarchist Bulgakov wasn't too high on the Stalin's danger list. During the Lenin rule there was no such thing as good Tsar - with Stalin, Peter the I think this helps to explain their some what bizarre relationship. Rereading: Mikhail Bulgakov's satirical fantasy A Dog's Heart was written in mock the rickety state of affairs that Vladimir Lenin's heirs had inherited. . His foppish dress by Bolshevik standards - the bow ties, the monocle - didn't help. the Soviet communist party, which would end with Stalin triumphant.
On 15 Junewhen the manuscript was nearly finished, Bulgakov wrote in a letter to his wife: The most important remains — editing, and it's going to be hard, I will have to pay close attention to details. Maybe even re-write some things Possibly, you will store the manuscript in one of the drawers, next to my 'killed' plays, and occasionally it will be in your thoughts.
Mikhail Bulgakov - Wikipedia
Then again, you don't know the future. My own judgement of the book is already made and I think it truly deserves being hidden away in the darkness of some chest Yelena Bulgakova remembered 30 years later, "When he finally finished reading that night, he said: Markov, in charge of the literature division of MAT later at the door fearfully tried to explain to me that trying to publish the novel would cause terrible things", she wrote in her diary 14 May On March 10,Mikhail Afanasyevich Bulgakov died.
On March 11, a civil funeral was held in the building of the Union of Soviet Writers. Before the funeral, the Moscow sculptor Sergey Merkurov removed the death mask from his face.
Will Self on The White Guard by Mikhail Bulgakov
Mikhail Bulgakov died from nephrosclerosis  an inherited kidney disorder on 10 March He was buried in the Novodevichy Cemetery in Moscow. His father had died of the same disease, and from his youth Bulgakov had guessed his future mortal diagnosis.
Works by Mikhail Bulgakov.
Even after his plays were banned from the theatres, Bulgakov wrote a comedy about Ivan the Terrible 's visit into s Moscow. His play Batum about the early years of Stalin was prohibited by the premier himself. In the mids, he came to admire the works of H. At the time, an illness passes through the chickens of Moscow, killing most of them, and to remedy the situation, the Soviet government puts the ray into use at a farm.
Due to a mix-up in egg shipments, the Professor ends up with chicken eggs, while the government-run farm receives the shipment of ostrich, snake and crocodile eggs ordered by the Professor.
The mistake is not discovered until the eggs produce giant monstrosities that wreak havoc in the suburbs of Moscow and kill most of the workers on the farm.
The propaganda machine turns on Persikov, distorting his nature in the same way his "innocent" tampering created the monsters. This tale of a bungling government earned Bulgakov his label of counter-revolutionary. Heart of a Dog features a professor who implants human testicles and a pituitary gland into a dog named Sharik means "Little Balloon" or "Little Ball" — a popular Russian nickname for a male dog.
The dog becomes more and more human as time passes, resulting in all manner of chaos. The tale can be read as a critical satire of liberal nihilism and the communist mentality. It contains a few bold hints to the communist leadership; e. The Master and Margarita[ edit ] Main article: The Master and Margarita Soviet postal stamp: The Master and Margarita became the best known novel by Bulgakov.
He began writing inbut the novel was finally published by his widow only intwenty-six years after his death. The book contributed a number of sayings to the Russian language, for example, "Manuscripts don't burn" and "second-grade freshness".
A destroyed manuscript of the Master is an important element of the plot. Bulgakov had to rewrite the novel from memory after he burned the draft manuscript inas he could not see a future as a writer in the Soviet Union at a time of widespread political repression.
The novel is a critique of Soviet society and its literary establishment. The work is appreciated for its philosophical undertones and for its high artistic level, thanks to its picturesque descriptions especially of old Jerusalemlyrical fragments and style. It is a frame narrative involving two characteristically related time periods, or plot lines: The novel begins with Satan visiting Moscow in the s, joining a conversation between a critic and a poet debating the existence of Jesus Christ and the Devil.
It develops into an all-embracing indictment of the corruption, greed, narrow-mindedness, and widespread paranoia of Soviet Russia. The novel was completely published more than 25 years after Bulgakov's death.
'Bulgakov. Two Biographies' Opens in Moscow
A story within the story portrays the interrogation of Jesus Christ by Pontius Pilate and the Crucifixion. Legacy[ edit ] Exhibitions and museums[ edit ] Several displays at the One Street Museum are dedicated to Bulgakov's family. Among the items presented in the museum are original photos of Mikhail Bulgakov, books and his personal belongings, and a window frame from the house where he lived. The museum also keeps scientific works of Prof. Bulgakov never claimed he was a conventional Christian as his father was.
For he did not trust the Orthodox Church; and in his very unconventionality is to be found the spring of his grandeur.
- The hound of hell
- Lenin vs Stalin: Their Showdown Over the Birth of the USSR
- Mikhail Bulgakov
In he took the monastic vows and was given the name Tikhon from the Greek: He taught in several ecclesiastical schools, and in was consecrated Bishop of Lublin, Poland. Merely a year later, he was made Bishop of Aleutians and Alaska, i. He spent several years in the United States and —what is more- was given American citizenship .
In he was appointed Bishop of Yaroslavl, Russia, and in was transferred to Vilnius, Lithuania. Even today the idea that the Russian Church was in favour of the Romanov Monarchy is widespread.What if Stalin Never Came to Power?
It is quite the contrary that occurred: Paradoxical as it may appear, the Russian Church was, in fact, the foe of Russian Autocracy. The reason is simple and clear: Peter I the Great had abolished the Moscow Patriarchate. The arguments that Jeremias II used in defence of his action were important: This was an assertion harmonized with the prophecy of Philotheus, hegumen in of the Yelizarov Monastery, Pskov: It was a somewhat apocalyptic Weltanschauung which had a considerable impact not only on Russian intellectual and spiritual life but on the Greek ones as well .
Ironically enough, it was a Russian Emperor and not a Papist or Moslem one to deliver a severe blow to the Third Rome. Actually, in the beginning of the eighteenth century Peter the Great abolished the Moscow Patriarchate, because he saw in the Patriarch a danger to his Crown. The Orthodox Church was the main pillar of Tsarist autocracy; but it considered itself, too, to be subjugated to the despotism of the Romanovs .
He fled abroad shortly after and contacted Lenin, with whom he had several important talks. Metropolites, Archbishops and Bishops, of the Russian Church .
Stalin visiting Lenin in Gorky in Lenin, who was in semi-retirement after suffering his second stroke, died the following year, making way for Stalin to succeed him as leader of the Soviet Union.
As Stalin presses his advantage, Lenin dies Stalin did his best to isolate Lenin from the rest of the leadership and keep his last letters secret. When Lenin heard of it, he became furious and demanded an apology. Stalin wrote back saying he apologized, but did not know what Lenin wanted of him—he had just been protecting the leader from unnecessary stress.
'Bulgakov. Two Biographies' Opens in Moscow
The next day, he suffered his third stroke, which left him permanently paralyzed. He died on January 21, The Russian Academy of Sciences, for example, would become an all-Union body.
But he won on the issue of the structure of the Union—the collection of discreet republics—a victory that, ironically, would ultimately have greater consequences for the Russians than for the others. In the state envisioned by Stalin, the Russians would have continued to share all those features with the empire, now renamed a Union.
Almost by default, Lenin became the father of the modern Russian nation, while the Soviet Union became its cradle. He is the author of numerous books, most recently, Lost Kingdom: The History of the Nuclear Catastrophe. We strive for accuracy and fairness. But if you see something that doesn't look right, contact us!